AIRS Lab case study
Element Wellness Center
Point Loma, San Diego
Headline finding
Element Wellness Center’s AIRS Score increased 11.2 points, from 57.0 to 68.2, seven days after an AIRS-informed site launch.
Both results came from the same 108-prompt instrument, so they are directly comparable. The measured ranges do not overlap: 56.2 to 57.5 at baseline against 67.7 to 68.6 after launch.
Score trajectory
Timeline
- June 29, 2026
- Baseline scan. AIRS Score 57.0 (measured range 56.2 to 57.5). 108 prompts, four AI channels.
- July 8, 2026
- AIRS-informed site launched: dedicated condition and treatment pages, structured data, and evidence-backed content.
- July 15, 2026
- Post-launch rescan. AIRS Score 68.2 (measured range 67.7 to 68.6). Same 108-prompt instrument. Directly comparable to baseline.
- July 30, 2026
- Verified rescan. AIRS Score 74.5 (measured range 74.2 to 74.7), on the expanded 110-prompt instrument. Reported as a current level rather than a delta, because the prompt set differs from the baseline.
- August 2026
- Next measurement. This page is updated as new comparable scans complete.
Component detail
Every AIRS Score is a composite of eight measured components. All eight increased between the comparable scans.
| Component | BaselineJun 29 | Post-launchJul 15 | Change | Verified*Jul 30 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mention rate | 28.9 | 38.9 | +10.0 | 55.7 |
| Rank position | 58.3 | 73.1 | +14.8 | 76.9 |
| Recommendation strength | 66.7 | 77.9 | +11.2 | 79.1 |
| Intent relevance | 84.7 | 89.6 | +4.9 | 92.6 |
| Evidence quality | 72.6 | 84.4 | +11.8 | 87.3 |
| Topic breadth | 71.6 | 91.2 | +19.6 | 85.7 |
| Cross-model consistency | 28.5 | 39.0 | +10.5 | 55.7 |
| Accuracy and safety | 49.9 | 57.0 | +7.1 | 63.3 |
| AIRS Score | 57.0 | 68.2 | +11.2 | 74.5 |
*Verified column: the July 30 rescan on the expanded 110-prompt instrument. Shown as a current level, not subtracted from the earlier columns, because the prompt set differs. The Change column compares the two same-instrument scans only.
Mention rate
28.9% → 38.9%
Share of qualified prompts that produced at least one mention, across the comparable scans.
July 30 verified reading: 55.7%.
AI recommendation share
4.8% → 5.8%
Element’s share of all practice recommendations detected in its market, across the comparable scans.
Topic movement
The scan measures visibility for every condition and treatment topic separately. Values below compare the baseline to the July 30 verified rescan.
Largest increases
- TMJ18.2 → 100
- Hip pain41.7 → 100
- Headaches11.1 → 66.7
- Herniated disc14.7 → 66.7
Still weak at last reading
- Adjustment0
- Myofascial release0
- Vibration therapy0
- Pregnancy6.3
- Shoulder pain18.8
Remaining gaps are the current work queue. That is the point of measuring.
Methodology and scope
Measured via official AI provider APIs with web search enabled. Consumer app results can differ because apps add personalization and their own retrieval behavior. API measurement gives reproducible, comparable data.
Results reflect observed association and do not guarantee identical outcomes for other practices. Scores depend on market, competition, starting conditions, and the specific date of measurement.
Get your own measurement
The same instrument that produced this case study, run on your practice, in your market.
Get Your AIRS Scan - $47Secure payment via Stripe. Results within 48 hours.